This quote by Voltaire, “He was not the greatest of men but he was the greatest of kings,” presents a dichotomy between the personal and the public. It suggests that a person’s private character may not always align with their public role or image. In this context, the person in question may have been flawed as an individual, but excelled in his role as a king.

The quote implies a separation of personal morality and public effectiveness. The “greatest of men” might suggest a person who is morally upright, kind, compassionate, and virtuous in every way. However, the “greatest of kings” might refer to a ruler who is effective, decisive, fair, and successful in leading his kingdom, irrespective of his personal virtues or vices.

This quote can be applied in today’s world in various ways. For instance, in the realm of politics, a leader might not be the most virtuous individual, but if they are able to effectively govern and bring prosperity to their nation, they may still be regarded as a great leader.

In terms of personal development, this quote might suggest that one’s personal flaws should not necessarily hinder one’s ability to excel in their role or profession. One could be lacking in certain personal areas but still be extremely competent and successful in their professional life. It is a reminder that personal and professional lives can be separate entities and one’s effectiveness in their role should not be solely judged on their personal character.

However, it also raises questions about the importance of personal integrity and morality in leadership roles. Should a leader’s personal character matter as long as they are effective in their role? Or should leaders be held to a higher standard of personal morality due to their influence and visibility? These questions remain relevant in today’s world as we continue to grapple with the complexities of leadership and morality.