This quote suggests that absolute power, which is unrestricted and unchecked, is often temporary. It is not sustainable because it typically breeds corruption, greed, and resistance from those who are oppressed. It also implies that leaders who rule with absolute power often face rebellion and overthrow, because they do not have the support or respect of the people they govern.
On the other hand, controlled power, which is balanced and regulated, tends to endure. This is because it is often more respectful of rights, more collaborative, and more considerate of the needs and interests of others. Leaders who exercise controlled power are more likely to have the support of the people they lead, and their leadership is therefore more sustainable.
In today’s world, this quote could be applied to various contexts. In politics, it could be a critique of autocratic regimes and a support for democratic systems where power is distributed and checks and balances are in place. In business, it could be a caution against CEOs or managers who rule with an iron fist, and an endorsement of those who lead with empathy, respect, and collaboration.
In terms of personal development, this quote could be a reminder of the importance of self-control and balance. For instance, in the pursuit of success, one might be tempted to exert absolute power or control over others to achieve their goals. However, this approach is likely to lead to resentment, resistance, and eventual failure. Instead, one should aim to exercise controlled power, which involves respecting others, collaborating, and maintaining balance in relationships. This approach is more likely to win the support of others and lead to sustainable success.