This quote suggests that arguments are generally unrefined and crude, and they can often sway people’s opinions, not necessarily because they are logical or based on truth, but because they are forcefully or persuasively presented. The quote implies a critique of arguments as a means of communication or persuasion, suggesting they might be more about winning than about reaching a mutual understanding or finding truth.

The term “vulgar” here doesn’t mean obscene or offensive, but rather common or lacking sophistication. Arguments, in this context, are seen as a simplistic and crude way of interacting with others, a way that disregards the nuance and complexity of individual perspectives and reduces them to opposing sides in a conflict.

The phrase “often convincing” reflects the power of arguments. Even if an argument is based on weak reasoning or false premises, it can still be convincing if it’s presented in a compelling manner. This highlights the danger of arguments: they can lead to the acceptance of flawed ideas or beliefs if they’re not critically examined.

In today’s world, this quote can be applied in many contexts, from social media debates to political discourse. It’s a reminder to be wary of arguments that seek to win at all costs, rather than striving for understanding or truth. It suggests the importance of critical thinking and the need to look beyond persuasive rhetoric to the substance of what’s being argued.

In terms of personal development, this quote might encourage us to focus on listening and understanding, rather than arguing. It might inspire us to explore more collaborative and respectful ways of communicating, where the goal isn’t to win an argument but to learn, grow, and build stronger relationships. It could also serve as a reminder to question our own beliefs and assumptions, especially when they’re based on arguments that we find convincing.