This quote suggests that we should evaluate our beliefs not merely based on how plausible or believable they are, but also by considering the potential harm they might cause. In other words, it’s not just about whether something seems likely or possible, but about the potential consequences if that belief were to be acted upon or if it were to become widespread.

For instance, a belief may seem plausible or attractive, but if acting on it could potentially lead to harm, discrimination, or injustice, it should be ranked lower. Conversely, a belief that might seem less plausible but leads to positive outcomes or promotes harmony and understanding should be ranked higher.

In today’s world, this principle could be applied in various ways. In the realm of politics or social issues, for example, certain ideologies or policy proposals might seem plausible or attractive to some, but if they could lead to harm or injustice, this principle would suggest we should be skeptical of them.

In personal development, this idea could be applied to our own beliefs and assumptions. We might hold certain beliefs about ourselves or the world that seem plausible, but if they are holding us back or causing us harm in some way, this principle would suggest we should reevaluate them. For example, a person might believe they are not good enough to achieve their dreams. While this belief might seem plausible to them based on past experiences, it is ultimately harmful as it prevents them from reaching their full potential.

In both cases, the focus is on the potential consequences of beliefs, rather than just their plausibility. This encourages a more critical and thoughtful approach to our beliefs, promoting greater understanding and empathy, and potentially helping to prevent harm or injustice.