This quote essentially implies that an increase in laws or rules tends to create more opportunities for those laws to be broken, thus producing more ‘criminals.’ It’s a commentary on how the complexity of a system can inadvertently lead to more transgressions. This idea is rooted in the belief that simplicity in governance and living can lead to a more harmonious society.

In essence, the quote suggests that excessive regulations may not always serve their intended purpose of maintaining order and peace. Instead, they might complicate life, providing more avenues for people to become lawbreakers. This is not to say that laws are unnecessary, but rather, it emphasizes the need for balance and thoughtfulness in creating and implementing them.

This concept can be applied in modern society in various ways. For instance, in socio-political contexts, it might suggest that governments should strive for simplicity and clarity in legislation, reducing bureaucracy and red tape. This could potentially lead to fewer instances of law-breaking and a more efficient system.

In the context of personal development, this quote might be seen as a call for simplicity and clarity in one’s personal rules and principles. By setting too many complex and stringent rules for oneself, one might end up feeling constrained and might struggle to adhere to them all, leading to feelings of guilt or failure. On the other hand, having a few clear, simple principles can make it easier to live authentically and ethically.

In a broader perspective, this quote might be interpreted as a critique of overregulation in any system, be it a society, an organization, or an individual’s life. The key takeaway is the importance of balance and simplicity, and the understanding that more rules do not necessarily lead to better behavior or outcomes.