This quote suggests that the concept of conscience, or moral discernment, is often more relevant to those watching an action rather than those performing it. The ‘agents of action’ are often too involved in their own motivations, desires, or needs to fully consider the ethical implications of their actions. On the other hand, the ‘observers’ are at a distance, and thus, they can more objectively assess the morality of the situation.

The observer’s role is not to pass judgement but to reflect upon the actions, and in doing so, they exercise their conscience. They are not bound by the immediate necessities or emotions that might cloud the agent’s judgement. This perspective allows them to see the broader ethical implications of the actions.

In today’s world, this idea can be applied in many contexts. For instance, in the sphere of politics and social issues, the public often serves as the observer. Politicians or those in power (agents of action) might make decisions based on a variety of factors, including personal gain or political strategy. It is up to the public, as observers, to use their conscience to evaluate these actions, hold those in power accountable, and advocate for what is morally right.

In terms of personal development, this quote suggests the importance of self-reflection. By stepping back and observing our own actions as if we were a third party, we can more objectively evaluate our behavior. This can help us to make more ethical decisions, grow as individuals, and better understand the impact of our actions on others. It’s about cultivating an internal observer, a conscience, that guides our actions, rather than being blindly driven by immediate needs or desires.