Waging war we understand, but not waging peace, or at any rate less consciously so.
Waging war we understand, but not waging peace, or at any rate less consciously so.
What did Fredrik Bajer mean by:

Waging war we understand, but not waging peace, or at any rate less consciously so.

The quote “Waging war we understand, but not waging peace, or at any rate less consciously so” suggests a profound observation about human behavior and social dynamics. On the surface, it highlights that conflict and warfare are often more straightforward for us to comprehend—both in terms of strategy and the emotions they evoke—compared to the nuanced process of creating and maintaining peace.

When we wage war, we have clear objectives, defined sides, and immediate actions that can be assessed; it’s a situation filled with visible adversaries, battles to be fought, and victories or defeats that can be clearly marked. In contrast, waging peace requires subtlety—it involves dialogue, compromise, empathy, understanding diverse perspectives, and often slow processes of reconciliation. It lacks the dramatic urgency of war but is equally vital for sustainable coexistence.

The idea implies that while society has extensive historical frameworks for engaging in conflict (military strategies have been studied extensively), there is comparatively less emphasis on understanding how to build lasting peace. This could stem from our instinctual reactions towards aggression as well as societal narratives that valorize warriors over peacemakers.

In today’s world—a time rife with political tensions both domestically and internationally—this notion has significant implications. For instance:

1. **Conflict Resolution**: As nations grapple with geopolitical strife or civil unrest within their borders today (like issues around ethnic tensions or resource distribution), understanding how to effectively engage in peacemaking becomes crucial. This might involve training diplomats not just in negotiation tactics but also in emotional intelligence skills like active listening and empathy.

2. **Personal Development**: On an individual level too this concept can apply profoundly; conflicts arise in personal relationships just as they do on larger scales. Recognizing when you are “waging war”—whether through argumentation or avoidance—instead of consciously “waging peace” by fostering open communication can transform your interactions significantly.

3. **Community Building**: In community contexts (be it workplaces or neighborhoods), focusing on building relationships rather than just resolving disputes helps cultivate environments where people feel valued and understood rather than divided into factions.

4. **Global Issues**: On broader global challenges such as climate change or poverty alleviation—the complexity of these problems necessitates collaboration across various sectors rather than combative approaches which may provide temporary solutions but fail at systemic levels.

Ultimately embracing this dichotomy encourages individuals to actively participate not only in identifying conflicts but also willingly engage in processes aimed at healing divisions—a skill set critical for nurturing harmony within our increasingly interconnected world.

Created with ❤️ | ©2025 Quotes Guide| Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer| Imprint | Opt-out Preferences

 

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?