This quote is a simplistic yet profound way of defining morality based on personal feelings and emotional responses. It suggests that the determinant of what is moral or immoral lies within our emotional reaction after performing an act. If we feel good, then the act was moral; if we feel bad, it was immoral.
This perspective on morality is subjective, as it relies heavily on personal feelings and emotions, which can vary greatly from person to person. It implies that morality is not a universal concept with a fixed definition but rather a personal compass that guides each individual’s actions based on their emotional responses.
However, this view can be problematic because it assumes that our feelings are always an accurate and reliable guide to what is right or wrong. This might not always be the case. For example, a person might feel good after committing an act that is generally considered harmful or unethical, or feel bad after doing something that is generally seen as good or beneficial.
Applying this idea to today’s world, it might encourage more introspection and self-awareness. People might become more conscious of their actions and their emotional responses to them, which could lead to more ethical behavior. However, it could also lead to moral relativism, where there are no universal moral truths and everything is subject to personal interpretation.
In terms of personal development, this idea could be used as a tool for self-reflection and growth. By paying attention to our emotional responses to our actions, we can gain insight into our personal values and beliefs, which can guide us to make more ethical decisions. However, it’s also important to critically evaluate our feelings and not rely solely on them to determine what is right or wrong.
