This⁣ quote is a simplistic yet profound way of defining morality based on personal feelings⁢ and‌ emotional responses. ⁣It suggests that the‍ determinant of what is moral or immoral lies ⁤within our emotional reaction after ⁤performing an act. If we feel good, then ​the act ‌was moral; if we ‌feel‌ bad, it was immoral.

This⁣ perspective on morality is subjective, as⁤ it⁢ relies heavily on ‍personal feelings and emotions, which can vary greatly from person to person. It implies that morality is not a universal concept with a⁤ fixed definition but rather ​a personal compass that guides each individual’s actions based on their emotional ‌responses.

However, this ⁢view can be problematic because it assumes‍ that​ our feelings are always an ⁢accurate and ⁣reliable guide to what ‌is right or wrong. This might not always be the case. For example, a person might feel‍ good after committing an‌ act that is⁣ generally ​considered harmful ⁤or unethical, ⁤or⁤ feel bad after doing something that‌ is generally⁤ seen as good or beneficial.‌

Applying⁤ this idea to today’s world, it might⁢ encourage more introspection and self-awareness. People might become more conscious⁢ of their⁣ actions and their ‍emotional responses to them, which could lead ​to more ethical behavior. However, it‍ could ⁢also‌ lead⁤ to‌ moral relativism, where ⁢there ⁤are ‌no universal moral ​truths and everything is subject​ to personal interpretation.

In terms of personal development, this idea could be used as a tool for self-reflection and ‌growth. By paying attention to ⁣our emotional responses to our ​actions, we can gain insight ⁤into our⁣ personal values and beliefs, which can guide us to make more ethical ⁢decisions. ‌However, it’s also important to ⁣critically evaluate ‍our feelings ⁤and not ⁢rely solely on them to determine what is right or wrong.