This quote suggests that love-making, or the act of pursuing and expressing romantic love, is a radical act because it often involves breaking boundaries, taking risks, and challenging the status quo. It’s about passion, spontaneity, and the thrill of the unknown.
On the other hand, marriage is described as conservative because it is an institution that is deeply rooted in tradition, rules, and societal expectations. It provides a structured framework for relationships and is often associated with stability, commitment, and predictability.
This dichotomy between the radical nature of love-making and the conservative nature of marriage reflects the different aspects of human relationships and the balance that is often sought between freedom and security, excitement and comfort, individuality and conformity.
In today’s world, this idea can be seen in the way society is gradually changing its views on relationships and marriage. More and more people are challenging the traditional concept of marriage and exploring alternative forms of relationships, such as open relationships, polyamory, and cohabitation without marriage. This could be seen as a shift towards a more ‘radical’ approach to love-making, where the focus is on personal fulfillment, emotional connection, and individual choice, rather than societal norms and expectations.
In terms of personal development, this quote could be interpreted as a reminder to embrace the radical, transformative power of love, while also recognizing the value of stability and commitment. It suggests that a fulfilling relationship involves both elements - the excitement of love-making and the comfort of marriage. It encourages us to be bold and adventurous in our pursuit of love, but also to appreciate the beauty of tradition, commitment, and shared values.
In essence, the quote is an invitation to explore the full spectrum of human relationships, from the wild and unpredictable to the steady and reliable, and to find a balance that works for us as individuals.