Reasoning is never, like poetry, judged from the outside at all.
This quote implies that reasoning, unlike poetry, is not subject to external judgment or interpretation. Poetry can be perceived and evaluated differently by each reader based on their personal experiences, cultural background or emotional state. The beauty of a poem lies in its ambiguity and the multitude of interpretations it can inspire.
Reasoning, however, is an internal process that follows a logical sequence. It’s not open to interpretation in the same way as poetry because it relies on facts and rational thought rather than emotions or subjective perspectives. Reasoning is judged by its adherence to logic and evidence; it either makes sense or it doesn’t.
Applying this idea today, we often see debates where people come from different perspectives but use reasoning as their common language. In politics for instance, politicians may have different ideologies but they all use reasoning to make their points clear and convincing.
In terms of personal development, understanding this concept could help individuals improve their communication skills. Knowing that your reasoning should be clear-cut and logical can guide you in presenting your thoughts more effectively. It also reminds us that while our feelings are valid and important for making decisions at times, they shouldn’t cloud our judgment when we need to think critically.
Moreover, acknowledging the difference between subjective (like poetry) and objective (like reasoning) ways of thinking can lead us towards better self-awareness – recognizing when we’re being led by emotions rather than logic could prevent us from making impulsive decisions.
