Jerome Ravetz Quotes

Philosopher

Jerome Ravetz

Jerome Ravetz is a British philosopher and historian of science. He is best known for his work on the philosophy of science, the sociology of scientific knowledge, and the history of science. He has written extensively on the relationship between science and society, and has argued for a more democratic approach to science and technology. He is the author of several books, including Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems (1971), The Merger of Knowledge with Power (1971), and The New Politics of Science (1984). He has also served as a consultant to the United Nations and other international organizations.Read Less

Wherever there’s a system, there’s a racket to beat it.

Author, October 3, 2023, Jerome Ravetz, Corruption, Exploitation, Resistance, 0

Jerome Ravetz

Philosopher

Jerome Ravetz Career Highlights

Ravetz received his Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from Cambridge University and his PhD in Philosophy from the London School of Economics.
He has held academic positions at various prestigious institutions, including the University of Leeds, the University of Oxford, and the University of York.
In 1971, he co-authored the book “Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems” with Silvio Funtowicz, which introduced the concept of “post-normal science.”
In 1993, he published the influential book “The Post-Normal Science of Precaution” with Funtowicz, which further developed the concept of post-normal science and its implications for science and policy.
He has served as a consultant for various organizations, including the European Commission, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization.
In 2003, he was awarded the Ziman Award for his contributions to the philosophy of science.
He has been a visiting professor at universities around the world, including Harvard University, the University of Tokyo, and the University of Melbourne.

Key Contributions by Jerome Ravetz

Ravetz’s most significant contribution is the concept of “post-normal science,” which challenges the traditional view of science as a purely objective and value-free endeavor. He argues that in complex and uncertain situations, such as climate change or genetically modified organisms, traditional science is inadequate and a new approach is needed.
He has also made significant contributions to the philosophy of science, particularly in the areas of uncertainty, risk, and ethics. He has argued for the importance of incorporating social and ethical considerations into scientific decision-making.
Ravetz has been a vocal advocate for the democratization of science, calling for greater public participation and involvement in scientific decision-making processes.
He has also been a strong critic of the traditional peer-review system, arguing that it is not equipped to handle the challenges of post-normal science and that alternative forms of quality control are needed.

What Sets Jerome Ravetz Apart

Ravetz’s work on post-normal science has been highly influential and has sparked much debate and discussion in the scientific community. He has challenged the traditional view of science and has offered a new perspective on how science should be conducted in complex and uncertain situations.
He has a multidisciplinary background, with expertise in mathematics, philosophy, and science policy. This has allowed him to approach complex issues from a variety of perspectives and to bridge the gap between different disciplines.
Ravetz is known for his engaging and thought-provoking writing style, making his work accessible to a wide audience. He has also been a mentor to many young scholars and has inspired a new generation of post-normal science thinkers.

Takeaways

Jerome Ravetz’s work has had a significant impact on the philosophy of science and has challenged traditional views of science and its role in society.
His concept of post-normal science has been widely debated and has influenced the way scientists and policymakers approach complex and uncertain issues.
Ravetz’s multidisciplinary background and engaging writing style make his work accessible and relevant to a wide audience.
He continues to be a leading voice in the field of post-normal science and is actively involved in promoting public engagement and democratization of science.

Other People