This quote is exploring the tension between simplicity and duplicity, two contrasting states of being. Simplicity refers to being straightforward, uncomplicated, and unpretentious, while duplicity refers to deceitfulness and double-dealing. The world, in this context, refers to society at large and its collective mindset.
The quote implies that society often undervalues simplicity, perhaps because it is seen as naive, unimpressive or unexciting. On the other hand, duplicity is also not openly approved of, as it involves dishonesty and manipulation. Despite this, duplicity might be quietly tolerated or even rewarded in certain situations, such as in politics, business, or personal relationships, where being cunning and strategic can lead to success.
However, the quote is also a critique of this societal attitude. It suggests that even though simplicity might be undervalued and duplicity might be quietly tolerated, this does not mean that simplicity is inferior or that duplicity is admirable. On the contrary, it implies that there is a certain integrity and strength in simplicity that is lacking in duplicity.
Applying this idea in today’s world, we could argue that we should strive for simplicity in our lives and in our interactions with others. This could mean being honest and transparent, avoiding unnecessary complications, and valuing authenticity over pretence. In personal development, this could involve focusing on our true interests and values, rather than trying to impress others or conform to societal expectations.
It’s also a call to society to rethink its values and attitudes. Instead of undervaluing simplicity and tolerating duplicity, we should appreciate the value of simplicity and condemn duplicity. This could lead to a more honest, authentic, and straightforward society, where people are valued for their integrity rather than their cunning.
