This quote poses a question that challenges humanity’s propensity for conflict and war, and instead, advocates for peaceful resolution through arbitration. Arbitration, in this context, refers to the process of resolving disputes outside of court, where a neutral third party, the arbitrator, makes a decision that is usually binding.
Franklin’s question suggests a vision of a world where people, nations, and organizations choose to resolve their differences through dialogue, negotiation, and compromise, rather than resorting to violence or force. He is imploring humanity to embrace a paradigm shift towards peace and understanding, rather than persisting in destructive behaviors.
Applying this quote to today’s world, one can see the relevance in various contexts. At an international level, it could refer to nations choosing diplomacy and negotiation over military action to resolve disputes. For instance, the United Nations, an international organization, is an embodiment of this idea as it provides a platform for peaceful conflict resolution through dialogue and consensus.
On a societal level, it could refer to protests and social movements that seek justice and change through peaceful means rather than violence. It could also apply to the criminal justice system, where alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation and restorative justice are gaining popularity.
In personal development, this quote can be a guiding principle in how we handle conflicts in our personal lives. Rather than escalating conflicts, we can choose to engage in constructive dialogue, empathetic understanding, and seek mutually beneficial solutions. It encourages emotional intelligence, patience, and the ability to see things from others’ perspectives.
Overall, Franklin’s quote is a call for humanity to evolve beyond conflict, and to adopt more peaceful, constructive methods of dispute resolution. It is a timeless reminder that peace and understanding are not only possible but are the paths we should strive to follow.
